慈善捐款去向如何
Can You Know Where Charity Dollars Go? Not Easily
LINDA WERTHEIMER, host: Things are not going well for Greg Mortenson, the author of the bestselling book "Three Cups of Tea." It's more than two weeks since "60 Minutes" raised questions about his books and his charitable work in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Groups have canceled speaking engagements. Even a planned honorary degree has been canceled. And Mortensons's doctor says the author is resting up for heart surgery.
In the meantime, the rest of the nonprofit world is trying to figure out how to assure donors that their money is in good hands. NPR's Pam Fessler has our report.
PAM FESSLER: The big question for many people is this: How do I know if my charitable dollars go where I think they're going? Not easily, says Daniel Borochoff, president of the American Institute of Philanthropy. He was one of the first to raise red flags about Mortenson's charity, the Central Asia Institute.
Mr. DANIEL BOROCHOFF (President of the American Institute of Philanthropy): It ought to be legally required, that if you're raising money for a cause, you have to be specific about what exactly that cause is.
FESSLER: He says some charities are vague. Central Asia Institute notes on its website that it spends 85 percent of its money on programs - such as building schools in Pakistan and Afghanistan - a mission Mortenson wrote about in his best-selling books.
But as "60 Minutes" noted, the charity failed to mention that its programs also included promoting Mortenson's books. The charity said it did so to educate the public about its cause, although Mortenson got the royalties.
Mr. BOROCHOFF: So as a donor, you've got to find out what is the charity's program because they're not clear about it.
FESSLER: Borochoff says donors can do some checking on their own. All charities file tax forms that are public.
In its latest filing, Central Asia Institute clearly states that it spent more on what it calls domestic outreach than it did on overseas schools.
Leslie Lenkowsky, with the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University, says it's not clear at all that Mortenson's group did anything illegal. Charities have a lot of leeway by design. But he says there are broader issues.
Dr. LESLIE LENKOWSKY (Director of Graduate Programs, Philanthropic Studies, Center on Philanthropy, Indiana University): One thing I would certainly encourage all donors to look at are things like composition of board of directors and turnover in key staff.
FESSLER: Central Asia Institute has only a three-member board, including Mortenson himself. That's allowed, but it's not considered a very good model for oversight.
Dr. LENKOWSKY: And then there's always the lesson that we all learn from our parents at a young age, if it seems too good to be true, it probably is. And the notion that an organization in short period of time could build as many schools as this one claimed to build in very difficult parts of the world, you know, would strain one’s credulity.
FESSLER: So many experts warn, don't get carried away by celebrity-driven causes. A big name doesn't necessarily mean a well-run charity. So what's a donor to do? They're often directed to rating sites, such as Charity . But even Charity Navigator's CEO, Ken Berger says the system falls short. So he's revamping it next year to focus more on a charity's actual impact.
Mr. KEN BERGER (CEO, Charity Navigator): And provide data on what kind of meaningful changes they're providing in people's lives. What kind of statistics do they have that corroborate the stories that they tell.
FESSLER: Berger hopes this will provides a more complete picture than the financial reports his site now relies upon. In fact, Charity Navigator gave Mortenson's group its highest rating, four stars, because it's financially sound, although the site now advises donors that the charity is the subject of an inquiry in Montana where it's based. Central Asia Institute says it will cooperate fully, it denies misspending any funds.
Some watchdogs, including Daniel Borochoff, think more government oversight and regulation would help. But there's resistance from charities.
Tim Delaney, president of the National Council of Nonprofits, says the overwhelming majority already do a good job.
Mr. TIM DELANEY (President, National Council of Nonprofits): The answer is not to play gotcha at the back-end. The answer is getting in front of the problem and preventing situations in the first instance.
FESSLER: He says this means providing more training for those who run charities on how to be transparent and more accountable to donors, so there are no unpleasant surprises.
Pam Fessler, NPR News, Washington.
WERTHEIMER: You're listening to MORNING EDITION from NPR News.
猜你喜欢内容
-
怎样提高阅读理解能力
首先,我们要对“阅读理解能力”及对四级阅读理解的具体要求作一定的了解。教学大纲要求 “较强的阅读能...
-
怎样使句子多样化
句子是由词或短语按语法规则组成,表达一个完整意思的语言单位。好的英语句子应该是结构意思正确完整,...
-
我是如何过六级的
不管四级还是六级,真题绝对重要!!!那些乱七八糟的模拟题或是其他的什么资料纯粹是浪费钱,我第一次...
-
如何充分利用好听力真题
根据听真题的不同层次,基本上,可以把听题分为以下五个阶段: 1. 初听 众所周知,听真题时的第一感觉...
-
如何进行判断和推理
在阅读中,人们首先理解的是语言的字面意义。然而,语言所表达的内容常常超过其字面意义。这就需要我们...
-
如何抓主题思想
主题思想(the Main Idea)。也称作中心思想,是作者在文章中要表达的核心内容,也是作者自始自终要说明的...
-
如何确定作者的观点或态度
一篇文章不可避免地反映了作者的观点、态度和情绪。能否正确把握作者的观点和态度也是体现阅读能力的重...
-
如何找主要事实特定细节
在文章中,作者总是要通过许多具体内容(Details)来说明、解释、证明或分析文章的主题思想。在通读全文、...
-
如何猜测词义
在阅读中,我们往往会遇到一些不认识的单词或短语,或者认识的单词在文章中有了新意义。如果这些词或短...
-
我的跨跨跨专业考研
这是本人第一次发贴。偶从hj上发掘资源供自己使用已久,今年又勉强获得读硕的机会,因此对hj上的xdjm心...





















